Performance vs. Trust: Rethinking Recruitment and Leadership
In the world of recruitment and leadership, a pressing question arises: Should we prioritise performance or trust when evaluating candidates and l...
Connecting...
In the world of recruitment and leadership, a pressing question arises: Should we prioritise performance or trust when evaluating candidates and leaders? Drawing inspiration from Simon Sinek's discussion on Performance vs. Trust, this article explores how this paradigm shift could reshape recruitment strategies and workplace culture.
The Navy SEALs, renowned for being the highest-performing teams on the planet, offer a fascinating insight. When selecting members for their elite Seal Team 6, they prioritise trust over performance. Their rationale? A high-performing individual with low trust is deemed "toxic."
Key Takeaway: While performance metrics are easy to measure—sales targets or billable hours met, deadlines achieved, profits achieved, client retention rates — trust is the invisible glue that holds a team together. High-trust individuals foster collaboration, reduce conflict, and create environments where teams can thrive long-term.
In many corporations, recruitment and performance reviews focus overwhelmingly on results. This misalignment stems from:
Short-term focus: The pressure to deliver results often leads to the promotion of high performers, regardless of their impact on team morale or trust.
Measurability bias: Performance metrics are tangible and straightforward, whereas trust is subjective and requires nuanced evaluation.
Implication for Recruitment Strategies: Hiring solely based on performance may yield immediate results but often comes at the cost of team cohesion and long-term sustainability. This is where trust-building becomes a differentiator for forward-thinking organisations.
To incorporate trust into recruitment, organisations must rethink traditional evaluation and recruitment methods. Here’s how:
Behavioural Interviewing: Ask candidates about past experiences where they prioritised team success over personal gain. Look for examples of integrity and relationship-building.
Cultural Fit Assessments: Evaluate candidates against the company’s core values. Do they align with a culture that values transparency, accountability, and collaboration?
360-Degree Feedback: For leadership roles, include insights from previous teammates and direct reports. High-trust leaders often leave behind a legacy of loyalty and respect.
Leaders who prioritise trust not only create better-performing teams but also nurture future leaders. Ron Potter’s blog highlights leaders whose trust-centric approach resulted in their team members becoming CEOs and high-ranking executives. This ripple effect of trust amplifies organisational success.
Recruitment is an important step toward building a culture where trust and performance coexist. While performance is essential, trust ensures that results are achieved sustainably and ethically. As recruiters, HR professionals, and business leaders, we must ask ourselves:
Are we hiring for long-term cohesion or short-term gains?
Are we evaluating leaders based on their ability to inspire trust?
Are we willing to invest in trust-building, even if it doesn’t yield immediate results?
As Simon Sinek poignantly concludes, individuals who prioritise trust over personal performance will find themselves valued and loved. The choice is simple yet profound: Do we aim to outperform everyone or to build meaningful connections?
By embedding trust into your recruitment processes, the same applies. By prioritising trust, we not only shape teams that deliver exceptional results but also create workplaces where individuals feel valued, respected, and motivated to contribute their best.
Successful teams are founded on trust and long term thinking. By choosing the right recruitment partner for your hiring needs, you will be assisted in identifying individuals who will elevate your team through trust, collaboration, and integrity. In the end, trust isn’t just a value—it’s the foundation of organisational success.